|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Phoenix Jones
Shockwave Innovations
Surely You're Joking
190
   |
Posted - 2013.10.24 12:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
Paradox, having day 1 biomass alts deploy these things are bad.
require anchoring level 1 or level 4 at a minimum to deploy it (yes I know they don't need anchoring, but should require the skill to at least deploy it).
This would also remove any possible trial account abuse in deploying these.
Stabbers are totally broken
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15116553
|
Phoenix Jones
Shockwave Innovations
Surely You're Joking
196
|
Posted - 2013.10.27 22:10:00 -
[2] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:Phoenix Jones wrote:Paradox, having day 1 biomass alts deploy these things are bad. Why? Eve is a game where there shouldn't be consequences to what you do.
This is Eve, not wow.
As long as there is somekind of actual ownership to it (aka you can find out who did it), I'm fine with the module.
People rolling a bunch of trial alts and spamming territories with these things leads to an issue of actual ownership and griefing (now I have no issue with griefing, but there is a limit to it, a total 1 day unknown dropping 100 of these in 30 systems...
eh.. no.
Now I'm sure people already will use characters on there other accounts, but at least those come from paid accounts, and not the 14 day freebies.
Stabbers are totally broken
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15116553
|
Phoenix Jones
Shockwave Innovations
Surely You're Joking
201
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 12:50:00 -
[3] - Quote
Katabrok First wrote:Well, we could have all the siphon units from a character who has been biomassed being not invisible to the API anymore...
I would have suggested changing the anchoring skill... But this one is as acceptable.
It does not address the issue of determining ownership of the mobile siphon unit.
These should be a point of conflict, not a grief tactic from an invisible for.
I would require the use of these to require a corporation that is not a NPC corp.
What this does is require people to make corps to drop them. Shell corporations would come up. Mercenary corps would do siphon setups for contract, and even small groups can get acknowledgement for these.
1) corporate requirement to anchor
2) person must be in the corp to anchor
3) if the corporation disolves, the unit becomes visible on api
4) if the person who dropped it biomasses, it becomes visible on api.
5) if the person leaves the corp, the unit becomes visible on api.
I'm afraid doing this would cause too many shell corporations, but sometype of ownership should be put on these devices.
Stabbers are totally broken
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15116553
|
|
|
| |
|